Nanopress Publishing: alternative poetry publishing, with gravitas
The indefatigable Nic S. has set up a website to advocate the new model of poetry publishing she’s pioneering with her own book, Forever Will End on Thursday (which I’ll be blogging next month).
The nanopress is a single-publication, purpose-formed poetry press that brings together, on a one-time basis, an independent editor’s judgment and gravitas and a poet’s manuscript. The combination effectively by-passes both the poetry-contest gamble and the dwindling opportunities offered by existing poetry presses, while still applying credible ‘quality control’ measures to the published work.
Join the discussion about this new paradigm at Nic’s blog — in particular, a post titled “Nanopress poetry publishing: Avoiding the publisher’s cycle of need.” Beth Adams, Ren Powell, Sarah Busse, and Rachel Barenblat are among the contributors to the comment thread so far.
The Washington Post: “In the Mideast, U.S. policy is still driven by realism” (Eugene Robinson)
Is it realism, or is it surrealism? It is certainly frustrating the way we never seem to have money for anything but destruction. We can only laugh to keep from crying: The Daily Show for March 21 was devastating.
The Palace at 2:00 a.m.: “The House of Words (no. 1)”
Novelist and poet Marly Youmans kicked off what she promises will be a 25-part series “on persisting, giving up, and other topics” connected with the writing life.
Giving up writing is easier than persistence because–surprise!–nobody much will mind if you give up. It’s not like giving up a job with a salary; there are few reproaches, and in fact many of your near-and-dear will heave great buffalo sighs and snort with relief. People will be glad to think that you may be a solvent person some day, rather than a struggling writer with the usual garret, heaps of foolscap, and bargain Toshiba laptop.
The New York Review of Books Blog: “The New American Pessimism”
Charles Simic is smarter than your average poet.
They say the monkey scratches its fleas with the key that opens its cage. That may strike one as being very funny or very sad. Unfortunately, that’s where we are now.
t r u t h o u t : “Instead of Bombing Dictators, Stop Selling Them Bombs”
But Gaddafi promised he’d only use them on terrorists!
NewScientist: “Fake tweets by ‘socialbot’ fool hundreds of followers”
“The success suggests that socialbots could manipulate social networks on a larger scale, for good or ill.” Good idea. I’ve heard that terrorists can use Twitter and Facebook to foment unrest.
xkcd: “Beauty”
It’s not every day that I get to read a web comic about my favorite organism, the dog vomit slimemold.
O: Maria Shriver interviews Mary Oliver
I’m not entirely sure who Maria Shriver is — some sort of Kennedy, apparently — but somehow she managed to lure the famously reclusive poet out of her shell. (And I’m pleased to see O magazine devoting its April issue to poetry. Here’s the New Yorker’s review.)
Finally, here are a couple of videos from Plummer’s Hollow that complement this past week’s podcast, “Creatures of the Night.” Thanks to our neighbors Troy and Paula for doing such a great job documenting the local wildlife with multiple trail cameras and sides of venison for bait.
That comic from xkcd has really been making the rounds. I wonder if Randall Munroe (the guy who writes xkcd) had any idea of the big response it was going to generate.
Oh has it? Cool. It should certainly hit home with anyone who knows any biologists. They are all about sense-of-wonder.
Yes, in fact you might be interested to know that it inspired a poem (or at least a Gilbert & Sullivan parody) – http://digitalcuttlefish.blogspot.com/2011/03/w-s-gilbert-meets-randall-monroe.html?
That’s awesome. I love it!
Thanks for the shout-out, Dave, and for being part of the nanopress conversation!
My pleasure. If I adopt the model myself, I probably will tack on a dollar or two of profit to the paper edition’s sale price, just so I can pay the editor something.
Which means, I guess, that you are officially more radical than I am. :)
Oh, I don’t know. In this maybe, but overall, I think we’re neck-and-neck.
Enjoyed the round-up, Dave!
Oh good! Thanks for stopping by.
Hey, my bargain Toshiba laptop is on its way back from the factory! I am so lucky!
I need to go see what Beth said to Nic…
You and Thoreau could have been neighbors who never saw each other. Even I know who Maria Shriver is! And that she is a best-seller type and married to a guy who probably would have run for president if not for those pesky birth certificate problems so annoying in the oval office. I’m assuming you are teasing.
No, I’m not teasing. But if she’s the Kennedyish lady who’s married to Arnold Schwartzenegger, then I guess I have heard of her, though I didn’t know she’d written books.
Evidently. As I don’t peruse the bestseller list, I can’t help you there.