Sometimes you try to find a way to explain how you do it or why— Kind of like the way a food or recipe tester, say, might boil hundreds and hundreds of eggs, set timers at 6 or 7 or 8 minutes to see which gives the jammiest center for ramen, which makes the perfect little breakfast orb to lower into the cute egg cup and tap on the head with a spoon until it shatters; which yields the least chalky yellow center for smooth deviled eggs and lively egg salad sandwiches. Is it disappointing when you can't explain such a need in terms of white oleanders or the soft, impossible fuzz on the cheeks of peaches, those kinds of things that others might have praised for the whole orchards they see flowering in the skin of a thing simply cradled in their hands? Not that you can't also be tender like that, or give a different flavor to burning wood. Through a closed door or a medium mistaken for a barrier, an absence of thought: the reverberation of some far-off machine still sends audible signals. Think of all the riddles you've ever been given to solve— There's a chamber walled in alabaster with a tree or carousel or snow globe at its center. Nothing can climb in or out. Or there is only one way to get in or out. Your desire is to have it whole, a geometry where nothing is subtracted, even when taken away.